Focus: New AMIT rules
15 December 2015
In brief: New legislation has been introduced into Federal Parliament that will replace the existing taxation regime for trusts which qualify as Attribution Managed Investment Trusts. Partner Charles Armitage (view CV) and Managing Associate Judith Taylor (view CV) look at what is different from the original Exposure Draft.
How does it affect you?
- The AMIT regime will apply to qualifying trusts, on an elective basis (the Exposure Draft envisaged a compulsory regime for qualifying AMITs), for income years commencing on or after 1 July 2016, although trustees may elect to apply it to their 2015-16 income year commencing on or after 1 July 2015. Any election to apply the AMIT regime to a trust will be irrevocable.
- The ATO has also released 'Draft Law Companion Guidelines' regarding some of the key elements of the AMIT regime and has called for submissions from industry by 15 January 2016. The draft Guidelines state that if a taxpayer relies on the draft guidelines in good faith before they are finalised and the law is enacted as introduced, the taxpayer will not have to pay any underpaid tax, penalties or interest in respect of matters covered by the guidelines if they do not correctly state how a relevant provision applies to the taxpayer.
- It is envisaged that the draft guidelines might eventually take the form of Public Rulings when the legislation is enacted.
The long-awaited new AMIT regime for the taxation of managed investment trusts (MITs), which will replace the existing Division 6 'present entitlement' provisions for certain MITs, was introduced into Parliament on 3 December 2015 in the Tax Laws Amendment (New Tax System for Managed Investment Trusts) Bill 2015 and it contains a number of differences from the original Exposure Draft (see our Focus: Managed investment trusts exposure draft legislation: impacts on funds management industry), which, in the most part, appear to be improvements.
- The list of entities that will qualify as 'eligible investors' for the purposes of the 'widely-held' requirements for MITs will be further expanded to include a limited partnership, if, throughout the income year:
- at least 95 per cent of its membership interests are owned, directly or indirectly, by eligible investors; and
- the remaining membership interests are owned by a general partner that habitually exercises the management power of the limited partnership.
This measure will apply to all MITs (ie not just AMITs).
- trusts that are managed investment schemes registered under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); and
- trusts where the rights to income and capital are the same for each membership interest in the trust.
Otherwise, taxpayers will have to refer to the ATO Guidelines (when they are released in their final form) for assistance in ascertaining whether beneficiaries have 'clearly defined rights'.
The proposed new anti-avoidance rule that will permit the Commissioner to tax 'non-arm's length income' received by a MIT at the rate of 30 per cent (the original Exposure Draft envisaged 49 per cent) will apply to all MITs, irrespective of whether they qualify as AMITS, although pre-existing MITs will not be subject to this rule until the income year beginning on 1 July 2018.
Trustees of MITs will need to:
- assess the potential impact of the new regime on current MITs;
- review existing trust deeds for eligibility for the AMIT regime;
- decide whether changes will need to be made to trust deeds to qualify for the AMIT regime;
- consider whether an election might be made for the AMIT regime to apply to a MIT and when any such election should take effect; and
- review existing arrangements to ensure that they comply with the new arm's length requirements.
- Charles ArmitagePartner,
Ph: +61 2 9230 4756
- Martin FryPartner, Practice Leader, Tax,
Ph: +61 3 9613 8610
- Judith TaylorSenior Tax Counsel,
Ph: +61 2 9230 4856
- Marc KempPartner, Sector Leader, Funds,
Ph: +61 2 9230 4991
- Penny NikoloudisPartner,
Ph: +61 3 9613 8816
- Geoff SandersPartner,
Ph: +61 3 9613 8673
You can leave a comment on this publication below. Please note, we are not able to provide specific legal advice in this forum. If you would like advice relating to this topic, contact one of the authors directly. Please do not include links to websites or your comment may not be published.