Energy (Oil & Gas; Remote Generation Thermal Power Projects)
Oil and gas businesses and remote generation operators are operating in a highly volatile environment, where price swings and physical supply constraints are directly affecting trading positions, supply commitments and project economics. For assets reliant on off‑grid power, shipping routes or imported fuel, disruption can have immediate operational and commercial consequences.
Uncertainty around fuel availability, logistics capacity and regulatory intervention is forcing heightened focus on risk allocation across sales, offtake, transport, storage and power arrangements. For remote generation assets in particular, questions around diesel procurement risk and how that risk is allocated under PPAs and O&M agreements are front of mind. At the same time, sustained volatility is testing whether existing pricing mechanisms, hedging strategies and contractual protections remain fit for purpose under prolonged stress.
These challenges are playing out against increased regulatory and competition scrutiny, particularly where supply is constrained and allocation decisions must be made. In this environment, resilience depends on rapid contract triage, disciplined alignment between trading and delivery positions, robust contingency planning and proactive engagement with governments, regulators and counterparties to protect continuity, compliance and long‑term value.
What this may mean in practice
- Price volatility and, in some cases, physical supply constraints are affecting trading positions, supply commitments and project economics
Emerging issues / developments
- Fuel supply risk in off-grid PPAs in remote locations
- Force majeure and change‑in‑law positions
- Regulatory oversight and engagement with government
- Price review mechanisms
- Quick execution of short-term spot sales
- Supply shortfall provisions
- Shipping constraints
- ACCC scrutiny
Key considerations
- Can price review mechanisms be used to re-open prices?
- Can force majeure be invoked where diesel cannot be procured due to disruption?
- For new remote generation thermal projects, should fuel procurement risk be allocated between the parties?
- Can change in law provisions be engaged if governments intervene through emergency fuel security measures, eg if fuel rationing is introduced?
- Can existing contracts realistically absorb sustained price volatility or physical supply disruption?
- How to allocate available fuel between customers from an ACCC perspective
What to think about now
- Triage key contracts (sales/offtake, transport/shipping, storage, feedstock, diesel/fuel supply, PPAs/O&M) for force majeure, change in law, supply shortfall and price review triggers
- Review hedging and pricing strategy (indexation, collars, pass‑through mechanisms) and align front‑office trading positions with contractual delivery and credit support requirements.
- Stress‑test operational continuity and logistics (shipping slots, alternative routes, storage capacity, critical suppliers, fuel delivery to remote and off-grid sites) and document contingency plans for regulators, joint venture partners and key customers
- Review risk allocation under existing PPAs and O&M agreements to assess whether current provisions adequately address prolonged diesel procurement or delivery failure, and develop contingency fuel supply plans for remote generation assets where gaps are identified
- Engage proactively with government and regulators on emergency measures (rationing, directions, price controls) and ensure internal protocols for compliant information sharing with competitors/industry
- Tighten counterparty and supply‑chain risk management (credit limits, security, termination rights) and confirm insurance notification/coverage positions for interruption, delay and maritime risks


